Inside Five Munchausen by Proxy Cases: A Forensic Interview with Dr. Steve Tutty
I would like to extend my sincere thanks to Dr. Steve Tutty for taking the time to share his thoughts and professional experiences regarding his assessment of Munchausen by Proxy.
I have had the privilege of knowing Dr. Tutty for more than seven years, dating back to my doctoral internship at Northwest Family Psychology in Seattle, Washington, where he served as my supervisor and mentor. Throughout his career, Dr. Tutty has brought a thoughtful, balanced, and clinically grounded perspective to psychological assessment and forensic evaluation, and I remain grateful for the training and guidance I received under his supervision.
For readers interested in learning more about Dr. Tutty, his professional background, and his forensic and neurodevelopmental evaluation services in Washington State, additional information can be found at the link provided below.
Inside Five Munchausen by Proxy Cases: A Forensic Interview with Dr. Steve Tutty
Dr. Steve Tutty described a professional career spanning nearly three decades, beginning in 1994 as a child counselor working primarily with children experiencing anxiety, depression, ADHD, autism, and other related conditions. After publishing research in depression and ADHD across randomized controlled trials (e.g., JAMA, JCCP, BT, etc.) he pursed a doctorate and completed this degree in five years in 2008 At the time, Dr. Tutty’s work expanded into psychological and neuropsychological testing, including evaluations for autism, ADHD, learning disabilities (twice exceptional), anxiety (e.g. OCD, PTSD, panic), and depression (bipolar illness, major depression). Over time, this clinical work naturally transitioned into forensic assessments, with increasing referrals involving children who required evaluations related to school risk concerns (e.g., school violence), behavioral risk (e.g., juvenile delinquency), injuries (school and work), or other legal and institutional matters.
By 2010, Dr. Tutty’s forensic practice expanded even more that included dependency court cases, civil parenting disputes, and personal injury evaluations (e.g, TBI’s following motor vehicle accidents). The formal referrals often involved questions about parental safety and child welfare, often following Child Protective Services interventions, while the latter referrals involved questions about proximate cause of injury and neurological rehabilitation.
Dr. Tutty explained that dependency cases typically involve the temporary removal of children from the home while parents undergo psychological and parental assessments to assess their risk, and how to reduce such risks with various service interventions, such as in-home parenting support, counseling, parenting classes, pharmacotherapy, and so on. Additional forensic work included bilateral parenting evaluations connected to high-conflict custody disputes across several US States, given the high demand in that domain. Throughout this period, Dr. Tutty maintained an active counseling practice while conducting extensive forensic and neuropsychological evaluations.
At the time of this writing, Dr. Tutty reported having completed more than 5,000 evaluations over the course of his career, including approximately 3,200+ child evaluations and roughly 1,800+ forensic or court-related assessments involving both children and adults.
The five Munchausen by Proxy cases discussed in the interview all originated through dependency court referrals from Washington State following CPS interventions. In each case, the children had been declared dependent by the state, and the court sought psychological evaluations to determine parental risk, appropriate interventions, and whether reunification or termination of parental rights was warranted, which was determined by the court. Dr. Tutty clarified that all identified perpetrators within this group were adult females.
Dr. Tutty explained that the five Munchausen by Proxy-related cases spanned in age between the ages of 22 and 36. These evaluations were conducted within dependency court proceedings after Child Protective Services intervention raised concerns regarding child safety and parental risk. In each case, social workers identified a concerning pattern in which the mothers repeatedly subjected their children to extensive medical evaluations, consultations, and testing across multiple hospitals and specialty providers. The central forensic question became whether these caregivers were responding to legitimate medical concerns or whether the children were being harmed through medical child abuse and Munchausen by Proxy.
Upon review of these cases, Dr. Tutty identified a recurring pattern in which children (spanning between age two to five) were taken to numerous specialists for a wide range of unexplained symptoms involving multiple body systems. Concerns included respiratory distress, skin irritations, hearing and vision problems, vomiting, sensory complaints, neurological concerns, memory problems, developmental and learning difficulties, fevers, sleep disturbances, and mobility issues. Despite repeated medical workups involving pediatricians, neurologists, allergists, pulmonary specialists, trauma examinations, blood testing, and other consultations, providers consistently reported no identifiable medical explanation for the children’s symptoms. While some children initially presented with observable acute symptoms such as dehydration, puffiness, limping, inflammation, or breathing difficulties, these symptoms frequently resolved when the child was separated from the caregiver and evaluated/treated more extensively by specialist. Dr. Tutty noted that once children entered structured programs or specialist care, they often improved rapidly, only for symptoms to reappear upon returning to the mother’s care, as ordered by the court when their risk decreased from the completion of various court ordered services.
Particular concern emerged in cases involving unexplained fractures and mobility problems. Dr. Tutty described instances in which children were found to have multiple fractures (e.g., rib, femur, and skull) across various stages of healing. Mothers frequently denied knowledge of how the injuries occurred and attributed them to minor incidents such as falling from the crib and bed, or running into tables, walls, etc., despite medical findings suggesting otherwise. Across all five cases, Dr. Tutty observed a repetitive cycle in which the caregiver persistently presented the child as medically fragile, severely ill, or in urgent need of intervention despite repeated reassurance from medical professionals that no underlying condition could be identified. He emphasized that the consistent pattern involved escalating medical concern, repeated provider shopping, temporary symptom improvement during separation from the caregiver, and recurrence of symptoms following reunification with the mother.
Dr. Tutty reported that all five mothers involved in these Munchausen by Proxy-related dependency court cases had professional or occupational connections to the medical field. Several worked in nursing assistant roles, one worked as a medical office manager, and another was a registered nurse. According to Dr. Tutty, each woman demonstrated advanced familiarity with medical terminology, medications, biological systems, laboratory testing, and healthcare procedures. He noted that when these mothers brought their children to emergency departments or specialists, there were often observable symptoms present, such as elevated white blood cell counts, coughing, nausea, skin irritation, mobility concerns, hearing/vision impairment, or other acute physical concerns. However, his role was not to determine medical causation directly, but rather to evaluate the mothers’ psychological functioning and provide the court and child welfare systems with information regarding their personality structure, psychopathology, and parental risk.
Dr. Tutty conceptualized the primary motivation in these Munchausen by Proxy -related cases as overwhelmingly centered on a fear of rejection whereby their children would no longer need or depend on them, in addition to the need for external recognition by doctors. While the mothers appeared to enjoy attention and validation from medical professionals, he emphasized that the deeper psychological drive involved ensuring that the child remained emotionally and physically dependent on the caregiver for their survival.
During interviews, Dr. Tutty described the mothers as exceptionally sophisticated in their use of medical terminology and highly knowledgeable regarding medications, laboratory testing, biological systems, and medical procedures. He noted that they often appeared energized, focused, and emotionally invested when discussing their children’s medical conditions, presenting as highly convincing and mission-driven caregivers. Although many maintained rigid routines and highly structured caregiving behaviors, Dr. Tutty did not identify significant obsessive-compulsive pathology. Instead, he observed persistent emotional intensity surrounding fears that something catastrophic would happen to the child without constant medical intervention.
Dr. Tutty reported that all five mothers had multiple children, with the dependent children involved in CPS intervention typically ranging between the ages of approximately two and five years old. The children were repeatedly presented for medical evaluation involving concerns related to feeding difficulties, respiratory issues, psychiatric complaints, endocrine problems, developmental concerns, and unexplained physical symptoms. In families with older siblings, those children often living with other caregivers or fathers due to prior custody disruptions or terminated parental rights. Information obtained from fathers and collateral contacts primarily described the mothers as manipulative, emotionally volatile, passive-aggressive, attention-seeking, and highly unstable in interpersonal relationships, though most collateral reports did not initially identify overt concern regarding abuse toward the children. Dr. Tutty explained that the mothers themselves were not voluntarily seeking treatment, but instead were court-ordered into evaluation following CPS concerns regarding medical neglect, emotional abuse, physical abuse, or unexplained injuries to their children.
Dr. Tutty explained that all five women completed the MMPI-2 as part of their psychological evaluations. Across these cases, he observed consistent elevations on the “fake bad” validity scale, which he described as reflecting exaggeration of symptoms and an amplified presentation of distress. He additionally identified elevations on Scale 1 (Hypochondriasis) and Scale 3 (Hysteria), suggesting significant somatic preoccupation, exaggerated concern regarding physical health, and a tendency to convert psychological distress into physical symptoms.
Dr. Tutty described these women as highly focused on bodily functioning, both in themselves and in their children, with patterns resembling chronic doctor shopping and persistent dissatisfaction with reassurance or treatment outcomes. In addition, elevations on Scale 8 were noted, which is often associated with impaired reality testing, feeling things are unreal, and socially alienated. Although these women did not meet criteria for schizophrenia or overt psychosis, Dr. Tutty noted that they often demonstrated insecurity, emotional isolation, suspiciousness, and episodes in which reality testing appeared compromised. He further described significant personality pathology involving narcissistic, histrionic, borderline, and manipulative interpersonal traits.
Another major finding identified by Dr. Tutty involved high levels of over-controlled hostility, a supplementary MMPI-related construct associated with suppression of anger and violent impulses until emotional control eventually breaks down. He theorized that these mothers appeared to channel unresolved hostility (likely from childhood) into medically focused behaviors directed toward their children rather than into overt violence toward adult partners. While many maintained employment and outward social functioning, Dr. Tutty noted that intimate relationships were often unstable, chaotic, and marked by manipulation, dependency, and controlling behaviors.
In addition, Dr. Tutty also found that all five women shared extensive histories of childhood sexual abuse, typically occurring within the family system and accompanied by profound abandonment by protective caregivers. Dr. Tutty conceptualized these experiences as central to the mothers’ later psychological functioning, theorizing that fears of abandonment, dependency needs, and a desire for emotional validation contributed to the development of controlling caregiving dynamics. In his formulation, the child became both a source of emotional security and a means through which the caregiver sought admiration, purpose, and interpersonal attachment through repeated medical intervention.
Regarding diagnostic formulation, Dr. Tutty identified Somatic Symptom Disorder as the primary diagnosis most consistently applied across cases, explaining that the limited scope and duration of court-ordered evaluations did not always allow sufficient time for a formal FDIA diagnosis. Secondary diagnoses most commonly involved histrionic and narcissistic personality pathology, with less prominent borderline features. Additional findings included intermittent explosive traits, impaired reality testing, paranoia, emotional detachment, and dissociative-like lapses that frequently emerged when discussing childhood sexual abuse histories.
Dr. Tutty also identified extremely elevated scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI), with all five mothers scoring substantially above the clinical cutoff associated with heightened risk for child maltreatment. He noted that two children presented with multiple unexplained fractures involving the legs, ribs, and skull over extended periods of time, without reasonable developmental explanations from caregivers. Ultimately, Dr. Tutty emphasized that while these mothers appeared motivated by attention and admiration from medical systems, the more enduring psychological objective involved maintaining control, emotional attachment, and dependency within the caregiver-child relationship.
Dr. Tutty explained that he did not observe strong evidence of early psychological Munchausen by Proxy presentations involving autism, ADHD, tic disorders, or extensive psychiatric testing within this particular group of cases. Instead, the most prominent pattern involved profound dependency and enmeshment between the mothers and their young children. Although one child presented with feeding-related concerns and recurrent vomiting episodes, Dr. Tutty noted that symptoms improved significantly during treatment with feeding specialists and tended to reappear only after reunification with the mother. The children involved in these cases were generally very young, ranging from approximately two to five-and-a-half years old, and Dr. Tutty described the caregiver-child relationships as highly codependent rather than driven by aggressive pursuit of neurodevelopmental diagnoses. He acknowledged that psychological Munchausen by Proxy remains an understudied area and emphasized that his observations were limited by the relatively small sample size of five court-referred cases.
Despite the limited sample size, Dr. Tutty emphasized that several findings consistently emerged across the evaluations, including elevated MMPI and Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI) results, significant histories of childhood sexual abuse, and reports of abandonment by primary caregivers or protectors during childhood, despite the caregivers or protectors witnessing the sexual abuse occurring in the home. He theorized that unresolved trauma, splitting defenses, and attachment disruption may have contributed to later projection of emotional distress onto their children. All five cases were ultimately classified as high-risk parenting situations, leading Dr. Tutty to recommend intensive interventions focused on child safety, parental education, and continued monitoring. His recommendations frequently included parenting education programs such as Incredible Years or Triple P, in-home nursing support, and additional services aimed at improving emotional regulation, developmental understanding, and parenting capacity. Dr. Tutty conceptualized these mothers as adults carrying unresolved developmental trauma that was subsequently reenacted within the caregiving relationship with their children.
The discussion also highlighted the potential significance of psychological testing within Munchausen by Proxy assessment and forensic evaluation. Dr. Tutty noted that many professionals working within multidisciplinary child abuse systems, including social workers, medical providers, and law enforcement personnel, do not routinely conduct extensive psychological testing capable of identifying personality pathology, trauma-related features, impaired reality testing, or elevated abuse potential. He reflected on the possibility that constructs such as intermittent explosive traits, dissociative-like processes, and over-controlled hostility may warrant greater attention in future Munchausen by Proxy research and assessment batteries. Dr. Tutty further distinguished his CPS-referred population from more traditional Munchausen by Proxy presentations described in prior literature, explaining that many of these mothers demonstrated unstable relationships, extensive trauma histories, poverty, domestic violence exposure, and broader adverse childhood experiences. In his formulation, the central psychological fear underlying many of these cases involved abandonment and loss, with the child functioning as both an attachment figure and a source of emotional stability, dependency, and validation for the caregiver.
Dr. Tutty explained that his professional training on Munchausen by Proxy and medical child abuse was initially broad rather than highly specialized. During graduate school, his education focused more generally on child pathology, parenting pathology, neglect, physical abuse, and sexual abuse rather than Munchausen by Proxy as a distinct phenomenon. He noted that while Munchausen by Proxy was occasionally discussed, the training primarily emphasized identifying risk factors associated with abusive or neglectful parenting, patterns within family systems, psychiatric overlays, and the types of circumstances that bring children into emergency departments or protective systems. Dr. Tutty stated that much of his understanding of Munchausen by Proxy developed later through cumulative clinical and forensic experience, particularly while evaluating dependency court cases and identifying recurring psychological and behavioral characteristics among caregivers involved in these referrals.
When discussing how clinician education could improve, Dr. Tutty emphasized the importance of training professionals to assess parental motivations, unresolved trauma, irrational fears, somatic preoccupation, and projection within caregiving relationships. He suggested that clinicians should receive more instruction regarding how certain personality traits, particularly histrionic characteristics, may be presented within parenting dynamics and medical child abuse contexts. Dr. Tutty also highlighted the recurring overlap between medical professions and Munchausen by Proxy-related presentations, while cautioning that employment in healthcare alone should never be interpreted as predictive of abuse. Additional areas he believed warranted closer attention included emotional empathy, interpersonal attachment patterns, ego strength, emotional regulation outside the parenting role, and the caregiver’s ability to maintain meaningful adult relationships independent of the child. He described several mothers as presenting with a superficially polished interpersonal style that often appeared rehearsed or performative, while internally exhibiting profound fears of abandonment, rejection, and emotional instability. Dr. Tutty also acknowledged that some of the emotional detachment and impaired interpersonal connection he observed raised questions regarding possible overlap with autism-spectrum traits, although no formal assessments for autism were conducted within these cases.
Looking toward the future of the field, Dr. Tutty expressed concern regarding the intergenerational transmission of unresolved trauma and emphasized the need for earlier preventative intervention before individuals become parents. He advocated for greater public awareness regarding childhood trauma, emotional functioning, and parental readiness, suggesting that developmental and psychological consultation prior to parenthood could potentially reduce future cycles of abuse and dysfunction. At the system level, he also recommended improved screening tools within primary care and emergency medicine settings to help identify concerning caregiver patterns earlier and facilitate referral for more comprehensive assessment. Although he acknowledged the small sample size of the cases discussed, Dr. Tutty noted that all five mothers ultimately lost their parental rights, as directed by the court, following repeated unexplained injuries, illnesses, and caregiving patterns. He emphasized that the decision to terminate parental rights was not based solely on psychological evaluations, but on broader patterns of unexplained fractures, medical concerns, and significant improvement in the children’s functioning once they were removed from the caregiver’s environment. According to Dr. Tutty, many of the children demonstrated substantial gains in eating, sleeping, emotional functioning, learning, mobility, memory, and overall development after placement outside the home, reinforcing the severity of the underlying caregiving dynamic.
A Note From Dr. Ari
If you or someone you know has been affected by Munchausen by Proxy, Medical Child Abuse, or Munchausen Syndrome, please know that support and resources are available. For educational resources, survivor support, advocacy, and professional guidance, please visit Munchausen Support: Munchausen Support | Resources for Families and Frontline Professionals Dealing with Munchausen by Proxy
If you are seeking consultation or additional information regarding these disorders, you may also contact me directly at dr.ari.g@munchausensupport.com.
© Gartin, 2025